|
7.
Red lines and self-censorship: Who is responsible? What are the
methods followed in drawing them?
Red lines drawn by private stations include failing
to criticise the Authority, failing to meet with Hamas leaders wanted by
the Authority, failing to transmit scenes showing the burning of the
American and Israeli flags and failing to cover the workers’ strikes. The
drawing of these lines may take place before the transmission and pursuant
to a communication made between officials in the Authority and the
administration of the station, expressing their objection to the screening
of a certain event or the discussion of a subject in a certain way.
 |
The person who may
make the contact by telephone
or by coming personally to the station is normally
a police spokesman, the preventive security or
any other member of the security service’s personnel. These normally
follow orders from higher officials.
On some amusing occasions such personnel has
come to a station to hand down the order whilst
being on air: some ensuing discussions have
consequently been transmitted live to viewers. |
If a problem has occurred one day before the program, they (the
security, especially the police) will call the station in anticipation
of coverage the following day. The station is asked not to mention
anything on the specific problem. Examples of such issues include the
dispute between members of the police and some citizens from
Beit-Sahour, the case when a woman was killed in the name of her
father’s honor and the dispute between the Mayor and some members
within the municipality.
Said Ahmad Hammad, director of Bethlehem 2000 radio |
|
Al-Amal TV in Hebron discontinued its transmission during a weekly
live program entitled “the bond must be broken” (which deals
specifically with the issue off Palestinian detainees in Israeli
prisons) because a woman called and asked that detainees inside
Palestinian prisons also be discussed. This cut in the transmission
was due to the fact that the administration of the station feared that
it risked being closed down by the security services following the
call.
al-Risala weekly newspaper, 5.11.98
|
Director and founder of Watan TV, Omar
Nazzal, confirms that the security services have interfered in tv
transmission in the past and that they continue to do so. He mentions an
incident that occurred prior to the closure of the station: “This was
before the third closure in September 1996, when a police officer told me
whilst I was live on air that the decision to close down the station had
been taken. All the viewers heard the conversation. At that same moment,
the Director of the Police called me and started to curse the officer live
on the air. These incidents occurred during the tunnel constructions [in
Jerusalem]”. The station reopened - after a closure that had lasted three
days - on the condition that no political communiqué be transmitted
without the approval of a person from the “political and moral
guidance” office who had to see and approve everything prior to
transmission. In another incident, Sa’eb Nassar from the political and
moral guidance office came and informed me (says Nazzal) not to transmit
or cover anything concerning the PFLP’s anniversary. The PFLP
anniversary is on the 11th of December
The decision to close down the station was taken by the Higher
Security Council, which includes all the officials of the security
services as well as the governor whom I asked to see the same night.
The Minister Jameel al-Tarifi stated that “Israel demanded that we
shut down Palestine TV and Watan TV: as to the former we have no
problem, but for the later, Watan TV,…
Omar Nazzal told the PHRMG
|
Other measures taken against Watan TV:
-
The governor called and asked that no news concerning the teacher’s
strike be mentioned. The strike ended at almost the same time so no
confrontation occurred.
-
At the time when Mohey-eddin al-Sharif was assassinated, the
security services called and asked that we “lower the tune” because we
were transmitting some nationalistic songs.
-
During the Iraqi crisis, during February – March 1998, the Ministry
of Information asked us not to transmit films showing the burning of
American and Israeli flags. Nor were we to transmit any declarations from
Palestinian officials. We were only to cover things as they happened in
Iraq!
The Ministry of Interior closed al-Rua’a (Shepherds)
TV in Bethlehem on 17 May 1999 after they screened the script play “Natreen
Faraj”. The Director of the station, Hamdi Farraj, received the
order for closure, issued by the Head of the Preventive Security Service
in the West Bank, which read: “Following the President’s instructions,
al-Rua’a TV which transmits from Bethlehem, will be closed on the grounds
that it has surpassed the limits of local TV stations…”
(See the
order for closure attached)
Palestinian
National Authority
Preventive Security H.Q.
Date: 17.5.1999
To: (Brother)Dirctor of police,
Bethlehem District
May God protect him
National Greeting;
Following instructions from his excellency
the President (Arafat), al-Ru'aa (Shepherds) TV that transmits in
Bethlehem District is to be closed, because it crossed the recognized
limits for local stations.
With my revolutionary greetings,
(Your brother)
Colonel Jibreel al-Rujoub
Head of Preventive Security
Northern Governances (West Bank) |
George Hazboun, Director General of the Ministry of
Interior for Social Relations in the Bethlehem District, said that the
Ministry is aware of the attempts that are made to stir up disputes
between different religions and sects and explained that the closure of
Al-Rua’a (Shepherds) TV came after employees of the
Ministry had watched a recording of the play “Natreen Faraj” which
ostensibly criticised Jesus Christ. On the other hand, Assistant Deputy
Minister of Interior Zakaria Abdel-Rahim maintains that the Ministry has
nothing to do with the closure of Shepherds TV. Representatives from
various religious groups and churches and institutions from the Bethlehem
area wrote to President Arafat requesting him to reopen the station,
stressing that they had not demanded its closure. They also expressed
their disagreement with the Authority’s explanation that Christians in the
area requested the closure
|
Farah TV ( in the Jenin area) has recently
focused directly on the relationship between the citizens of Jenin and
the municipality of Jenin through providing live coverage of the
peoples’ daily problems, including fluid and solid waste in the
streets and administrative problems. The TV station has prepared
several reports on this subject, but we were astonished about the
position of the municipality’s representative, who said: “ Farah TV is
opposed to the municipality and to the Mayor: there was a plan to harm
the reputation of the municipality”. This stance has made us rethink
and change our programmes as we feared that officials might take
action against us. The municipality could, for example, carry out an
inspection and make life difficult for us.
PHRMG interview with Fathi Saeed Hussain
al-Natour, 32 years of age, married, journalist from Jenin and
Director of Farah TV. |
On the 16 & 17 February 1998, eight
television stations were closed by the Ministry of Information on the
grounds that they had violated some of the rules and orders related to
their work. The Head of Police, General Ghazi Al-Jabali, has issued an
order to all police directorates ordering that all proprietors of
television stations should sign a commitment confirming that “they would
respect the national interest and that there should be no reporting on
rallies, demonstrations or on any news that might affect stability and
that there should be no screening of flag-burning”. He also stipulated
that any stations not implementing this commitment would be closed down.
(Al-Quds newspaper, 18 February 1998). Nevertheless, these stations
were reopened on 18 May 1998.
On 16 February 1998, the Ministry of Information had already issued
a decision ordering all private radio and television stations working
within the Autonomous Palestinian Areas no to “transmit any news or
comments made by Palestinian officials related to developments in the
Iraqi crisis and only to cover international news without comment”.
From the annual report of the PHRMG
8. Is there Israeli interference in the work of these stations?
As a consequence of failing to accept the Palestinian share in the use
of the air waves and frequencies, Israeli settlers also use these air
waves and thus interfere with the work of the stations. Not only does this
force stations to change frequency but it also prevents the Authority from
issuing permits as it cannot decide on which frequency the station will
run.
| “ We used
to transmit on an authorised wave-length, until they [the Israelis]
established a supporting station in Bizgat Zaev settlement which
destroyed our transmission. We had to change frequency, which meant
that we had to purchase new equipment. It took us some time to
transmit, which meant that we lost some of our viewers”. PHRMG
interview with Omar Nazzal, Director of Watan TV
|
There is also Israeli pressure on the PA to close down stations directly
or indirectly opposing Israeli interests. As an example, the Head of the
Israeli army in the West Bank, Brigadier Ishaq Eitan, had asked the leader
of the Palestinian national forces in the West Bank, Haj Ismail Jabr, to
close down the eight television stations in February 1998 on the grounds
that they transmitted news and pictures of demonstrations and flag-burning
during the Iraqi crisis. When these two men met in the coordination office
in Bethlehem, Haj Ismail Jabr expressed understanding of the Israeli
position. Al-Quds newspaper, 18.2.1998
Does the law regulate private stations?
There is no law on the audio-visual media, but
according to an administrative memorandum issued by the Minister of
Information, the Palestinian press law of 1995 is considered to be a
reference point for dealing with private stations. Legislation on this
matter is not possible before an agreement has been reached regarding the
Palestinian share in the airwaves and before such details have been
registered with the International Telecommunications Association.
PHRMG interview with al-Masri
The following are some of the problems that have
arisen because of the absence of such a law:
-
Permits issued for these stations are time bound (for a short
period of time)
-
There has been interference by Ministries in each other’s work;
-
There has been interference by the security services in the work of
these stations with the imposition of broad red lines depending
exclusively on the mood of the security official in a given area; when
such limits have been exceeded, the station has been closed down.
Why is there no private station in the Gaza
Strip?
There is no private radio or television station in
the Gaza Strip. It appears that he Authority is set on maintaining the
official Palestine radio and television as the only functioning stations
in the Strip. PHRMG therefore contacted Maher al-Masri in the Ministry of
Information who refuted such an assertion. PHRMG also contacted one of the
citizens who had applied for a permit to open a private television station
in the Gaza Strip.
|
“We have not taken any official decision
preventing the opening of stations in the Gaza Strip and we are ready
to review any application presented to us and to take the correct
decision if the conditions are fulfilled” PHRMG
interview with Maher al-Masri
|
The PHRMG has learnt that a person from Gaza Strip
applied in June 1999 to establish a private TV station in the Gaza Strip:
in October 1999 he has still not received a response.
Abuses committed against Palestinian journalists:
Abuse of Palestinian journalists for crossing the
red line has varied in its nature and intensity. The 50 violations
committed between 1994 and 1999 recorded by the PHRMG were of the
following nature:
 |
- Injury from gun shooting
2%
- Beatings 12%
- Breaking or confiscation of cameras 6%
- Confiscation films or videos 8%
- Summoning, stopping or detaining 68%
- Raiding offices and confiscation of contents 6%
- Closure of offices 12%
- Signing commitments for the future 12%
- Confiscation of press and / or personal IDs 4%
These abuses were not limited to one security service but were
committed by several organs: the police, General Intelligence,
National Security and Preventive Security. We would stress that two
thirds of these violations took place in the Gaza Strip and that the
police forces are responsible for a total of 38% of all abuses.
|
Parties responsible for abuse in percentage terms:
- The Police 38% Gaza
4% WB
- General Intelligence Service 22% Gaza 4% WB
- Preventive Security Service 6% Gaza 8% WB
- National Security Service 2% Gaza 6% WB
Yearly breakdown of the 50 recorded
violations in percentage terms:
1994
6%
1995
12%
1996
30%
1997
20%
1998
24%
1999
6%
There are no signs indicating an improvement in the situation. Abuses
reached their highest level in 1996, fell in 1997, increased in 1998 and
dropped a little for the first 9 months of 1999. Yet the question remains:
are these figures indication enough or have past abuses led to increased
self-censorship with a view to avoiding the Authority’s interference
altogether?
Violations and
Abuses committed by the Palestinian Security Services against journalists
22 May 1999
The criminal intelligence in Gaza
arrested the writer of an article and the Chief Editor of al-Risala
newspaper for publishing a report on the torture of a citizen in a
Palestinian prison.
9 March 1999
A unit from General
Intelligence broke into the house of journalist Fayed Abu-Shammala and
confiscated videos, documents and press material. This was not the first
time that Abu-Shammala has been abused: security guards at the entrance to
the Presidential office had prevented him from entering to cover news in
September of 1998 without providing reasons.
PHRMG
interview with Abu-Shammala
8 March 1999
Men from the General Intelligence shot at
the press office of Abdel-Salam Abu-‘Askar, broke into it and attempted to
smash one of its doors.
December 1998
Members of the
Palestinian Police arrested eight journalists from the Gaza Strip, after
they had covered a march organized by the Popular Front. During the march,
American and Israeli flags were burnt in protest against the
American-British aggression against the people of Iraq. The PA also closed
television stations and local radio stations, claiming that the former had
screened marches in which flags were burnt and that such screening would
harm Palestinian national security. One the same day the PA closed down
three press offices working for Reuters, Associated Press and the Cinema
Production Centre. Journalists arrested for several hours reported that
their cameras had been confiscated and that two of them had been beaten by
the police. The following day, the offices were reopened.
December 1998
Members of National Security confiscated
Ja’far Ishtayeh’s camera on the grounds that he had been filming a march
in support of political prisoners in the Juneid detention center.
23 November 1998
During the signing of the Wye River
Memorandum, police forces blocked the roads leading to the house of Sheikh
Ahmad Yassin, the spiritual leader of Hamas. The police detained eleven
journalists working for foreign agencies who were present at Sheikh
Yassin’s house, because of their intention to record television interviews
with him. They confiscated all cameras and films and told them that they
required prior authorisation from Criminal Intelligence if they intended
to conduct such interviews.
18 November 1998
The Political Security Department of the Palestinian Police in Gaza
summoned Dr. Hamad, the Chief Editor of the weekly al-Risala (the
Message). The paper reflects the point of view of al-Khalas
(Salvation Party). The Police raised the matter of his paper’s
publications, which it described as “hot” and warned him indirectly that
he should take care to avoid such “hot” subjects.
13 September 1998
Saber Noureddin, a journalist who works as a correspondent for the “France
Agency” in Gaza was summoned by the police and detained for ten hours. The
day before he had been prevented from filming a rally organized by Hamas.
After refusing to hand over his camera and the film, both his personal
and professional identification cards were confiscated by the police
29
August 1998
A group of policemen heavily beat the journalist Muneer Abu Rizeq, the
editor of Al-Hayat Al-Jadida newspaper, using weapons, fists and
feet. His tape recorder and glasses were also broken. The grounds for this
action was his presence at the Military Court in Gaza attending the trial
of the two brothers Mohammed and Majdi Ibrahim al-Khaledi.
 |
25 August 1998
Members of the Preventive Security Service (PSS) beat a
photographer from Al-Hayat Al-Jadida newspaper, Naser Naser,
who was subsequently taken to hospital. The PSS confiscated his camera
and broke a second one belonging to journalist Majed al-Arouri. The
beating and confiscation took place because the two journalists had
refused to stop filming a sit-in by human rights organizations outside
the house of the martyr Imad Awadallah: the Palestinian Security
Services had surrounded his house and had prevented the Awadallah
family from leaving it. It is worth mentioning that the police refused
to record the complaint Naser Naser made against the PSS and told him
that they would only do so if it were made against an unknown party.
|
20 July 1998
The journalist Ahmad Khalil al-Mashharawi, 27 years of age, was summoned
by the Intelligence Service because of a photograph he had taken of the
(suddenly) bald journalist Majdi al-Turk: the security service had shaven
his head. The person who interrogated him asked him: “In whose interest
was this photograph taken?”
14 May 1998
Members of the National Security heavily beat journalist Imad al-Ifranji,
who works as a correspondent for al-Quds newspaper, whilst he was covering
clashes between Palestinian youngsters and Israeli occupation forces near
the Ghosh Qatif settlement in Gaza Strip.
5 May 1998
Two members of the General Intelligence Service arrested journalist Abbas
al-Momani from a press office in the Tannous building in Ramallah.
Without presenting him with an official warrant or a detention order,
they asked al-Momani to accompany them. On 10 May, al-Momani escaped from
prison after having been tortured but was arrested again the same day. He
was finally released on 14 May after committing himself verbally not to
mention the incident to anyone.
9
April 1998
The Palestinian police’s criminal investigation unit arrested the
following Reuters correspondents in Gaza: Taher Shreiteh, Nidal
al-Mughrabi, Ahmad Jaddallah, Shams Shana’a and Soudah Abu-Seif. All five
were asked to sign an undertaking not to work again and not to cause
disputes and troubles. All five refused. Following the intervention of
Zakaria al-Talmes, the Head of the Journalists Association in Gaza, on the
morning of 10 April 998, it was agreed that the journalists would
undertake to be careful and precise in their work and that when reporting
news they would respect the Palestinian press law.
17
March 1998
Criminal Intelligence prevented journalist Abdel-Rahim al-Qusseini (AP)
and his colleague Abdel-Rahman Khabeisseh (WTN) from filming a women’s
sit-in in front of the Nablus Governance office, which had been organised
in support of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli and Palestinian prisons.
17 March 1998
The Preventive Security Service in Gaza detained Dr. Ghazi Hamad at the
“Tal al-Hawa” detention center, because of an article he had written
in al-Istiqlal (Independence) newspaper about the relationship
between the PA and Palestinian citizens. He was released on 27 April 1998
without having been brought to trial. His release was not authorised by
the Attorney General. Dr. Hamad, who was tortured during his arrest, said:
“They read my articles on the relationship between the citizen and the
security services and beat me heavily with wires”.
7 March 1998
Security Services arrested journalist Nawaf al-‘Amer (Nablus Press
Office).
20 February 1998
Members of National Security arrested journalist Nasser Ishtayeh and his
brother Ja’far, both of whom are reporters for two foreign agencies, on
the grounds that they had filmed both a march in Balata camp in support of
Iraq as well as the burning of Israeli and American flags. All the footage
was confiscated. Both journalists were released after two hours following
intervention by their agencies.
December 1997
Members of National Security beat the journalist Ja’far Ishtayeh and
detained him for six hours on the grounds that he had filmed a march in
support of Iraq. He was asked to sign a commitment not to film scenes
depicting incitement to violence, nor the burning of flags.
PHRMG interview with Ja’far Ishtayeh
On the same day, a police force broke into the Reuters office in Gaza
and announced its closure for a period three months. The cause? The
release of a film showing an interview with Adel Awadallah who is still
accused by the Authority of taking part in the assassination of
Mohey-eddin al-Sharif. The office was reopened on 15 April 1998.
26 October 1997
The journalist and
human rights activist Khaled al-‘Amayreh was arrested by Preventive
Security in Jericho after he had published a report in the weekly
newspaper Sawt al-Haq wa
al-Horiyeh
(Voice of Rightfulness and Freedom) - published inside the green line - on
the torture of Hamas detainees. He was released the following day after
midnight.
30
May 1997
Members of Criminal Intelligence arrested the journalist Maher Farraj
after ten at night and took him to police headquarters in Gaza. After one
hour he was taken to the office of Colonel Talal Abu Zeid and was asked
not to publish anything potentially provoking the PA. Colonel Zeid
apportioned him with the responsibility for the publication of an article
written by Dr. Ayoub Otman from al-Azhar University, entitled “On the
Margin of the Report by the Monitoring Committee”, an article the Colonel
considered as constituting incitement against the PA. He added that Mr.
Farraj, as director of the newspaper, should not publish such an article.
Farraj was detained until 4 am.
4
December 1996
The journalist Maher Farraj was summoned to the Intelligence Service in
Gaza where he was asked by Colonel Mohammed al-Masri to present all
reports to him before publication in al-Bilad (the Country) newspaper.
11
November 1996
A group of journalists were arrested and their films confiscated after
they had covered a march organised by the Popular Front for the Liberation
of Palestine (PFLP) following a military attack committed by the Popular
Front near the village of Surda, Ramallah. The journalists lodged a
complaint with President Arafat and were released. “We understood that
the President reacted positively in the favor of the journalists” said
Majed al-Arouri, one of the journalists.
9
September 1996
The journalist Maher Farraj was summoned to the Ministry of the Interior
in Gaza by the Director of Public Affairs, Omar, who asked him not to
publish anything on the al-‘Ahd (the Oath) political party, a party
affected by internal disputes.
19 June 1996
The journalist Maher Farraj, 32 years of
age and director of al-Bilad (the
Country) office in Gaza, was summoned to the Preventive Security
headquarters where he was questioned by captain Ibrahim Abu el-Sheikh
about a report published in the newspaper entitled “A thousand Shekels is
the price of a permit for lorries to Gaza” and asked him to give him the
source of the story. Farraj was summoned on a daily basis for one week,
ending on 27 June 1996. His ID was taken away for two days for answering
back to insults made against him by Abu el-Sheikh. His card was returned
after the intervention of the Journalists Association in Gaza.
14 May 1996
Three members from the General
Intelligence Service broke into the Office of France Agency (AFP) in Gaza
City and arrested the journalist Fayez Ibrahim Noureddin on the grounds
that he had published a photograph of some youngsters pushing a donkey
into the sea, with the phrase “ Specialised in Donkeys!”
written below the photo. Mr. Noureddin
took the photo, but it had not been him who had added the phrase. Yet it
is clear that his arrest followed an accusation that he had added the
commentary. During his arrest one of the three persons who arrested him
tied his hands behind his back, whilst the other two covered his head with
a bag and pushed him violently into their vehicle. They put him on the
floor of the car, kicked him heavily with their boots and insulted him.
This behaviour continued until they reached their headquarters (al-Saraya)
where one of them took off his boot and beat Noureddin with it. He then
grabbed him by his neck and told him to curse himself.
After beating him for half an hour, they
placed him between the metal door of the cell and the wall and pushed him
violently. They then pushed him into the cell, and ordered him to stand
with his arms in the air for two hours. They then brought a book and a pen
and asked him to write his autobiography. He was taken to an interrogation
room where three officials questioned him about the photograph and the
person who had forced him to take it. He was asked whether he worked for
French Intelligence, but Fayez refused to answer any questions: he
believed that it was the Ministry of Information or the Journalists
Association who had the right to question him and not the General
Intelligence. He was finally asked to sign a commitment,
which he did, whilst also telling his
interrogators that he would lodge a complaint against them. Their
response? “If you say one word, we’ll punish you”.
He was released at 9 pm. An official from
the Preventive Security Service contacted Fayez on the same day the
photograph was published and asked him to come to their premises. Fayez
refused and said that if they wanted to see, they should obtain an
official summons from the Attorney General.
30
March 1996
The Security
Services abused and beat the following Nablus journalists with clubs:
Abdel-Rahman Khabeiseh, Hussam al-Qadah (al-Nahar correspondent) and
Abdel-Rahim al-Qusseini.
7 March 1996
The journalist
Muhsen al-Ifranji, 29 years of age, was arrested by members of the General
Intelligence Service at his house in Gaza at around 10 pm. He was
questioned about essays and articles he had published in
al-Quds
newspaper and was asked to sign a commitment not to harm the PA’s
interests. Al-Ifranji was badly treated during his detention. Whilst being
taken to an interrogation room, his head was put in a bag and his hands
were tied behind his back. He told the PHRMG:
“For 7 days I was alone in a cell and
was interrogated three times a day, mainly at night. I was threatened. I
had never expected to be put in such a position. I wish they would allow
us to do our duty without suffering such abuse”.
Muhsen’s
detention lasted for 21 days. He was not charged and was not presented
before a judge. No legal action was taken and he was released on 28 March
1996 .
6
March 1996
Palestinian Security Services prevented journalists from filming a student
march organised by Hamas in Nablus and broke into the house of journalist
Hassan al-Titi (Reuters) in order to confiscate footage of the march.
27
February 1996
‘Ala Saftawi was arrested by a police
force after midnight because of his editorial article that had appeared in
the 16 February 1996 edition of al-Istiqlal
(Independence) newspaper, entitled “Oath and Responsibility”. The article
spoke about the deteriorating security situation. During the
interrogation, the police claimed that the article disrespected the
President’s personality. Saftawi told them: “I never meant to
disrespect the President. All I wanted to do was discuss the deteriorating
security situation and to warn people about it”.
He was detained for three days.
|
in 1996 the journalist (F.A) was summoned by
Preventive Security following a report on the release of Hamas
detainees from Palestinian prisons. He was asked by captain Ibrahim
Abu-el-Sheikh as to how he had received information for that report.
He was detained for five hours. The next day he was called in again by
the same security service in “Tal el-Hawa” and was questioned about
the same report. “They told me that it wasn’t right to publish
everything”. He was released after one and a half hours. |
24 February 1996
A member of the police beat the journalist Nasser Ishtayeh, insulted him
and smashed his camera on the grounds that he had been filming the
transfer of caravans into “Yousef’s tomb” in Nablus. This incident
occurred during the disturbances triggered by the opening of the tunnel
near the al-Aqsa Mosque. The policeman’s security unit claimed later that
the policeman’s actions were justified because he had wanted to prevent
Nasser Ishtayeh from entering a closed military area. Nasser told the
PHRMG: “I discovered later that the site wasn’t a declared closed military
area and that the decision to prevent me from filming was taken by the
policeman himself. I therefore filed a complaint against him at the
governing office and was told later that he had been detained for 48
hours”.
February 1996
A unit from
“Intelligence, Police and Preventive Security” detained a journalist from
Jenin for a period of six months without bringing charges or bringing him
to trial. He was interrogated about his relations with Hamas and about his
correspondence with Islamic newspapers. “They were tough, rude, used
insulting language and made me stand in a specific way (shabeh) for
more that three hours. PHRMG interview February 1996
A unit from “Intelligence, Police and Preventive Security”
detained a journalist from Jenin for a period of six months without
bringing charges or bringing him to trial. He was interrogated about his
relations with Hamas and about his correspondence with Islamic newspapers.
“They were tough, rude, used insulting language and made me stand in a
specific way (shabeh) for more that three hours.
PHRMG interview
8
October 1995
The journalist
Mohammed Taher el-Nounou was summoned to General Intelligence offices (al-Saraya)
by the official Ayman al-Kafarneh. Before responding to the summons, he
passed by the Ministry of Information and told them of the matter. He
subsequently went to al-Saraya and met al-Kafarneh who asked him firstly
about his source of information regarding Hamas’ communiqué on the
delegation mediating between the PA and Hamas and secondly about its
content, which had maintained that the delegation did not really represent
Hamas. The report in question had been published in al-Nahar newspaper and
had given al-Nounou as the source in Gaza. After some rounds of
questioning, al-Kafarneh asked two men to blind-fold his eyes and he was
pushed into a cell where he remained for two days. Al-Nounou told the
PHRMG: “They used to let us out
three times every day only for the purposes of relieving ourselves”.
On the
morning of 10 October 1995, they questioned him again whilst he was still
blind-folded and beat him. He was then taken back to his cell and then to
the office of the ex-Attorney General Khaled al-Qidrah. The latter asked
him “not to be a trouble-maker and not to attack the PA”. He was then
released.
August 1995
A gun was shot at the University Lecturer
Dr. Abdel-Sattar Qassem after he had published an article in “al-Watan”
(the Homeland) newspaper in which he criticised President Arafat and the
PA. The article was entitled “Democracy in the Shadow of the President”
and argued that the President did not accept individuals disagreeing with
him or refusing to follow his orders.
|
It is not possible for a journalist to exercise his
proper role in the media, unless his material and social rights are
guaranteed and unless he receives all the suitable protection he
requires. The Palestinian media is not directed and the evidence shows
that the Ministry of Information has licensed a large number of press
establishments.
Tawfeeq Abu-Shomer, Director General of the Press Department in the
Ministry of Information, in al-Quds newspaper on 1.4.1999.
On 21.5.1996, the Palestinian Journalists Association sent an open
letter to members of the Palestinian Legislative Council saying:
“We, the Palestinian
journalists, continue to suffer whilst trying to obtain news and
official information from our PA and from political parties. We
continue to discover that some officials, ministers and leaders, or
those below them, prefer to speak only to foreign or even Israeli
reporters “.
They add: “ We document hereby
that the various Security Services have arrested or abused more than
25 journalists for reasons related to their work. We have found that
in most of the cases, such action was in no way justified to the
extent that some people nowadays avoid working directly with the press
whilst others prefer to work secretly for the local security services
in order to obtain news: this is often harmful to our PA”. |
The Security Services confiscated the
weekly magazine of the “Fatah” movement al-Sahl al-Falastini
(The Palestinian Plain) because its carrying of an article critical of the
Palestinian police. They also arrested the author of the article, Zaki
al-Kilani.
12
July 1995
Colonel Mohammed
al-Masri from General Intelligence summoned journalist Imad al-Ifranji who
worked for al-Quds Press
agency. He interrogated al-Ifranji for five days about a report that he
had published. During the interrogation his head was put in a bag and
finally he was forced to sign a commitment that he would never disobey the
PA. Failure to do so would lead to tough punishment. Colonel al-Masri
threatened to speak with the director of the
al-Quds Press
agency as soon as the PA had moved into the West Bank. He added that the
arrest of al-Ifranji was to be seen as a message to his agency. The agency
should now be aware as to which type of reports to publish. Al-Masri also
threatened Imad by telling him that he would personally be held
responsible for any negative report published in Gaza.
|
The office for
Institutional Security with the General Intelligence Service in Gaza
prevented journalists from the al-Hayat al-Jadida
newspaper from being transferred to the General Employees Department.
Among those was Hassan Douhan, 24 years of age, who had been with the
newspaper for three years; Mustafa Sheikh el-Eid, 29 years of age, who
had been with the newspaper for four years as head of the computer
section; and the journalist Sameer Hamto, 30 years of age, who had
been with the newspaper for four years. All four presently receive
separate salaries from the newspaper, without benefiting from
contracts, rights or insurance.
A decision was
taken in December 1997 to transfer 18 employees from
al-Hayat al-Jadida
to the General Employees Department. The Institutions Security Office,
headed by Colonel Abu Hasan ‘Ajweh, excluded these four journalists
from this transfer. The likely reason? Their suspected affiliation
with the Islamic trends. |
14 May 1995
Palestinian police closed down the premises of al-Watan (the
Homeland) newspaper, following a decision of the State Security Court. The
newspaper was prevented from appearing and one day after his arrest, a
decision was taken to imprison its Editor-in-Chief Sheikh Sayed Abu-Musameh
for three years on the grounds that he had published articles of an
inciteful nature against the PA. A judgment in absentia was also handed
down against the Editor, Dr. Ghazi Hamad, condemning him to two years
imprisonment. Both judgements were not executed and Sheikh Abu-Musameh was
released after eight months following a deal between the PA and Hamas.
PHRMG interview with Dr. Ghazi Hamad
February 1995
The
following six employees from al-Istiqlal (the Independence)
newspaper were arrested by Palestinian Intelligence: Editor-In-Chief ‘Ala
Saftawi, ‘Atiyeh Abu Mansour, Khaled Sadeq, Zakaria al-Madhoun, Mohammed
Fayyad and Nahed Kutkut. Saftawi was released after 23 days. The others
remained in prison for three months.
The General Intelligence Service in Gaza detained journalist Taher
Shreiteh, who works as a reporter for Reuters, for six days, on the
grounds that his agency had distributed a film on the kidnapping of the
Israeli soldier Nahshon Vaxman. The Reuters correspondents in Gaza, Shams
Odeh, Sawwah Abu-Seif and Ahmad Jadallah, were also arrested and released
the same day.
April 1994
Members of Force 17 arrested the
journalist Imad al-Ifranji, who at the time worked for the al-Quds
Press agency, and searched his house from
where they took two fax machines and a video. They interrogated him in
al-Saraya for more than half an hour and took him to a military camp in
Jabalya dealing with Presidential security, where they questioned him
about his profession. He was taken back to al-Saraya after two days, where
he stayed for a further two days. Imad told the PHRMG: “They released me
after one am. I asked about the reason for my arrest but they would not
say”.

|